Teoría democrática

Joseph Schumpeter y la síntesis moderna

Authors

  • Godofredo Vidal de la Rosa

Keywords:

democratic theory, democratic governance, citizenship, political participation

Abstract

The Schumpeter contribution to modern democratic theory consists in to limit the meaning of Democracy to a mere electoral competition in order to build governments. This model is named realist because dismiss the citizenship expectations and abilities to influence and control the results of democratic governance. It reduces the citizen role to the act to vote. However Schumpeter model is hegemonic in the contemporary political science, especially in the economic theory of democracy. This essay examines the logical and empirical consistency and limitations of Schumpeter theoretical model.

References

Arblaster, Anthony (1987), Democracia, México, Nueva Imagen, 1991.

Bachrach, Peter, Crítica de la teoría elitista de la democracia, Argentina, Amorrortu, 1973.

Bobbio, Norberto, El futuro de la democracia, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1986.

Collins, Randall, The Sociology of Philosophies. A Global Theory af Intellectual Change, Cambridge, The Belnak Press of the Harvard University Press, 1998.

Dahl, Robert, “A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model”, American Political Science Association, vol. 52, núm. 2, junio, 1958.

——, Democracy and Its Critics, Yale University Press (traducción: Paidós, segunda edición, 1993.

Dewey, John (1927), El público y sus problemas, Buenos Aires, Ágora, 1958.

Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy, Nueva York, Harper and Brothers, 1957.

Mackie, Gerry, Democracy Defended, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.

——, “Schumpeter’s Leadership Democracy”, work paper, 2ª draft, Notre Dame University, abril, 2005.

Manin, Bernard, Los principios del gobierno representativo, Madrid, Alianza, 1997.

Medearis, John, Schumpeter, Two faces of Democracy, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2001a.

Medearis, John, “Ideology, Democracy and the Limits of Equilibrium: A Schumpeterian Critique”, British Journal of Political Cience, vol. 31, núm. 2, abril, 2001b.

Mitchell, W.C., “Schumpeter and Public Choice, Part I. Precursor of Public Choice?”, Public Choice, 42, 1, 1984a.

——, “Schumpeter and Public Choice, Part 2. Democracy and the Demise of capitalism: The Missing Chapter in Schumpeter”, Public Choice, 42, 2, 1984b.

Mosca, Gaetano, La clase dominante, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica (traducción de la edición de 1923).

Mueller, Denis, Public Choices III, Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Pateman, Carol, Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1970.

Przeworski, Adam, “Una defensa de la concepción minimalista de la democracia”, Revista Mexicana de Sociología, vol. 59, núm. 3, julio-septiembre, 1997.

Ricci, David M., “Schumpeter Attenuattted. Schumpeter, the Process Theory and American Democratic Theory”, The Journal of Politics, vol. 32, núm. 2, mayo.

—— (1984), The Tragedy of Political Science. Politics, Scholarship and Democracy, New Haven, Londres, Yale University Press, 1970.

Riker, William, Liberalism against Populism, Waveland Press Inc., 1982.

Sartori, Giovanni (1987), Teoría de la democracia. El debate contemporáneo, México, Alianza, 1989.

——, Homo Videns. La sociedad teledirigida, Madrid, Taurus, 1988.

Shapiro, Ian (2003), The State of Democratic Theory, Princeton University (traducción Ed. Bellaterra, 2005.

Scheuerman, William, Carl Schmitt. The End of Law, Lanhman, Rowman & Littefield Publishers, Inc., 1999.

Schumpeter, Joseph, Historia de las teorías económicas, México, 1950.

—— (1942), Capitalismo, socialismo y democracia, Barcelona, Orbis, 1983.

—— (1955), Imperialismo y clases sociales, Buenos Aires, Tecnos, 1965.

Simon, Herbert, “A Mechanism for Social Selection and Successful altruism”, Science, vol. 250, núm. 21, diciembre, 1990.

Taylor, Charles, Imaginarios sociales modernos, Paidós, Colección Básica, 2001.

Tilly, Charles, Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Vidal de la Rosa, Godofredo, “Retos pluralistas. Comentarios sobre las visiones del pluralismo democrático”, Sociológica, año 7, núm. 19, México, 1992.

——, La ciencia política estadounidense. Trayectoria de una disciplina, México, Miguel Ángel Porrúa, 2006.

——, Teoría democrática contemporánea, México, UAM-Azcapotzalco, 2007.

Wolin, Sheldon S., Tocqueville between Two Worlds. The Making of a Political and Theoretical Life, Princeton University Press, 2001.

——, “Inverted Totalitarism”, The Nation, 19 de mayo de 2003.

Published

2010-04-28

How to Cite

Vidal de la Rosa, G. (2010). Teoría democrática: Joseph Schumpeter y la síntesis moderna. Argumentos Estudios críticos De La Sociedad, (62), 177–199. Retrieved from https://argumentos.xoc.uam.mx/index.php/argumentos/article/view/357